Jacome
Jacome v. Vlahakis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 18CV0010-GPC-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED
COMPLAINT
DIMITRIS VLAHAKIS, et al, [ECF. No. 54.] Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Defendant San Diego County Sheriff’s Deputy Dimitris Vlahakis (“Deputy Vlahakis”) and San Diego County Sheriff’s Deputies Ryan Smith, Kyle McGarvey, Matthew Seitz, James Parent, Habib Choufani, Joshua Pirri, and Joshua Linthicum (“Deputy Defendants”)’s March 25, 2019 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) pro se Plaintiff Alexander Jacome’s Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 52.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion suitable for adjudication without oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY During the course of litigation, Plaintiff has filed and the Court has ruled on the 27 …