Brannon

Brannon v. Barlean's Organic Oils, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20193:18-cv-01619California3,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORY BRANNON, individually, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01619-BTM- and on behalf of others similarly MDD 12 situated, ORDER DENYING Plaintiff,

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

14 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARLEAN’S ORGANIC OILS,

[ECF NO. 4] LLC, Defendant. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 4 (“Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J.”)), which Plaintiff opposes. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant Barlean’s Organic Oils, LLC (“Barlean’s”) for violations of California business practices law and common law causes of action. Plaintiff, a consumer, purchased dietary supplements (“products”) manufactured by Barlean’s. (ECF No. 1 (“Pl.’s Compl.”), ¶ 1.) Barlean’s labeled and advertised its products with the following statements: “Nature’s Perfect Superfood,” “Pathway to a better life,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.