Barber

Bell v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20193:18-cv-01491California2,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 3:18-cv-01491 DMS (BGS) RICHARD N. BELL, an individual, ORDER GRANTING MOTION Plaintiff, FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12 v.

STEPHEN JAMES BARBER;

JETSETZ, INC.; and DOES 1-100, ROE Corporations I-X, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Richard N. Bell’s motion for default judgment. Defendants Stephen James Barber and Jetsetz, Inc. did not file an opposition. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Richard Bell is an attorney and professional photographer. (Compl. ¶ 5.) Defendant Stephen Barber does business in the Southern District of California and is the owner and registered agent of Defendant Jetsetz, Inc. (Id.; Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of Mot. (“Mot.”) at 2.) In March 2000, Plaintiff took a photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.