Barber
Bell v. Barber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 3:18-cv-01491 DMS (BGS) RICHARD N. BELL, an individual, ORDER GRANTING MOTION Plaintiff, FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12 v.
STEPHEN JAMES BARBER;
JETSETZ, INC.; and DOES 1-100, ROE Corporations I-X, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Richard N. Bell’s motion for default judgment. Defendants Stephen James Barber and Jetsetz, Inc. did not file an opposition. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Richard Bell is an attorney and professional photographer. (Compl. ¶ 5.) Defendant Stephen Barber does business in the Southern District of California and is the owner and registered agent of Defendant Jetsetz, Inc. (Id.; Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of Mot. (“Mot.”) at 2.) In March 2000, Plaintiff took a photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline …