Read

Paycom Payroll, LLC v. Read

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20193:18-cv-02638California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAYCOM PAYROLL, LLC, Case No.: 18-cv-2638-WQH-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO

v. AMEND THE SCHEDULING

ORDER

NIKKI READ,

Defendant. [ECF No. 19] 16 Before the Court is the Joint Motion of the parties, filed on September 16, 2019, to amend the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 19). For the reasons that follow, the Joint Motion is DENIED. LEGAL STANDARD A scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “good cause” standard “primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY Discovery was available to the parties following the Rule 26(f) conference under Rule 26(f) occurred on February 21, 2019. (ECF Nos. 12, 13). The Case Management Conference took place on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.