Penn Air Control Inc v. Bilbro Construction Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the Case No.: 16-cv-003-WQH-NLS Use and Benefit of PENN AIR 12 CONTROL INC., a California ORDER corporation,
14 v.
BILBRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC., a California corporation; and
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY
17 INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims. 21 HAYES, Judge: 22 The matters before the Court are 1) Alpha Mechanical, Inc.’s (“Alpha”) Motion for 23 Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Pre-Judgment Interest (ECF No. 289); 2) Shadpour Consulting 24 Engineer, Inc.’s (“SCE”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (ECF No. 292); and 3) 25 Alpha’s Motion to Re-Tax Costs (ECF No. 315). 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND The background to this action is described in detail in the Court’s Order on Bilbro Construction Company, Inc.’s (“Bilbro”) Motion for New Trial. (ECF No. 335). II. ALPHA’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND PRE-