Khamooshian

(PC) Bradford v. Khamooshian

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20193:17-cv-02053California1,839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 17-cv-02053-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING IN PART

v. THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

K. KHAMOOSHIAN, et al., [ECF No. 160] Defendants. 17

I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first complaint was brought only against two individuals, Defendants Zhang and Khamooshian, and he alleged Eighth Amendment violations, gross negligence, and medical malpractice. (ECF No. 1.)1

25 1 As the Court noted in its original order, “Plaintiff has been previously denied leave to proceed IFP in the Eastern District of California because he has had more than three civil actions or appeals dismissed due the actions being found to be frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim upon which relief could be 27 granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).” (ECF No. 21,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.