Erhart

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20193:15-cv-02287California7,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART THE BOFI FEDERAL BANK, PARTIES’ MOTIONS

REGARDING FILING

Defendant. DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 18 19 20 And Consolidated Case 21 22 Presently before the Court are twelve motions concerning filing documents under seal. The parties filed the motions in connection with their cross-motions for summary judgment and a motion to exclude expert testimony. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motions. 27 BACKGROUND2 Defendant BofI Federal Bank is a federally chartered savings and loan association. Defendant’s holding company, BofI Holding, Inc., is publicly traded under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. BofI hired Charles Matthew Erhart as a Staff Internal Auditor in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.