Anderson

Anderson v. Does 1-6

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:18-cv-02137California1,905 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA ANDERSON, Case No.: 18cv2137-JAH (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 29) DOES 1-6;

MARK HELD, METROPOLITAN

TRANSIT SYSTEM – S.D.T.C.;

GREGORY WILLIAMS, TRANSDEV

SERVICE, INC.,

17 Defendants.

19 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Transdev Services, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Lisa Anderson’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”). Doc. No. 29. The motion is unopposed. After careful consideration of the pleadings, and for the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. BACKGROUND On September 14, 2018, pro se Plaintiff Lisa Anderson filed an action against Defendants Does 1-6, Mark Held, Metropolitan Transit System-S.D.T.C., Gregory Williams, and Transdev Service, Inc., alleging “deprivation of civil rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.