Fluordx LLC v. Quidel Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:18-cv-02866California2,265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLUORDX LLC, Case No.: 18-CV-2866 JLS (NLS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

QUIDEL CORPORATION, (ECF No. 14) Defendant. 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant Quidel Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss (“MTD,” ECF No. 14). Also before the Court are Plaintiff FluorDx LLC’s Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 15) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 17) the Motion. After considering the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff FluorDx, LLC is a California limited liability corporation located in Carlsbad, California. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 3, ECF No. 13. Defendant Quidel Corporation is a Delaware corporation licensed to do business in California and headquartered in San Diego, California. Id. ¶ 4. Plaintiff is the owner by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.