Haag

Haag v. San Diego Sheriff Dep

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:19-cv-01460California2,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL DAVID HAAG, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1460-AJB-MSB

CDCR #BJ-0331,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) SAN DIEGO SHERIFF DEP’T; LVN [Doc. No. 2]; AND 16 #6131; LVN #6222; LVN #6977; LVN #7403, (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 20 21 22 23 24 Paul Haag (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate currently incarcerated at the California Medical Facility located in Vacaville, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 at 1. 28 Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.