Siegler

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20193:18-cv-01681California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARA ELIZABETH SIEGLER, et al. Case No. 3:18-cv-01681-GPC-MSB Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., et MOTION TO APPEAR REMOTELY al.,

AT THE UPCOMING HEARING;

15 Defendants. (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR AN

EXTENSION TO FILE A REPLY;

AND

18 (3) SCHEDULING HEARING ON

PENDING MOTIONS.

20 [ECF Nos. 134, 140, 142.]

On August 2, 2019, the Court granted Defendants BDL Products, Inc., Cargenix Holdings LLC, Henry Ji, Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., and TNK Therapeutics, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, ECF No. 126, and entered judgement against Plaintiff Sara Elizabeth Siegler (“Plaintiff”), ECF No. 127. The dismissal order and judgment have spawned numerous follow-up motions aiming to 27 have the Court reconsider its August 2, 2019 ruling and seeking other forms of relief including a change of venue, permission to exceed page limitations, an extension of 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.