Amador-Stewart
Amador-Stewart v. Snooze HIC, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TRINITY AMADOR-STEWART CASE NO. 18cv01604-LAB-MDD
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION vs. TO DISMISS
SNOOZE HIC LLC and DOES 1 14 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Trinity Amador-Stewart brought this putative class action against Defendant Snooze HiC, LLC for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and California Labor Code, seeking unpaid overtime, unpaid compensation for interrupted and/or missed meal and rest periods, and failure to pay minimum wage. She also seeks interest, penalties, costs, and attorney’s fees. She amended her complaint once, so the amended complaint (“FAC”) is the operative pleading. Snooze moved to dismiss. (Docket no. 6.) Amador-Stewart filed an opposition (Docket no.9), and Snooze filed a reply brief. (Docket no. 11.) Then Amador-Stewart filed a second opposition (Docket no. 12) and withdrew her earlier opposition. The motion is now fully briefed and ready for decision. / /…