Amador-Stewart

Amador-Stewart v. Snooze HIC, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:18-cv-01604California3,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRINITY AMADOR-STEWART CASE NO. 18cv01604-LAB-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION vs. TO DISMISS

SNOOZE HIC LLC and DOES 1 14 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Trinity Amador-Stewart brought this putative class action against Defendant Snooze HiC, LLC for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and California Labor Code, seeking unpaid overtime, unpaid compensation for interrupted and/or missed meal and rest periods, and failure to pay minimum wage. She also seeks interest, penalties, costs, and attorney’s fees. She amended her complaint once, so the amended complaint (“FAC”) is the operative pleading. Snooze moved to dismiss. (Docket no. 6.) Amador-Stewart filed an opposition (Docket no.9), and Snooze filed a reply brief. (Docket no. 11.) Then Amador-Stewart filed a second opposition (Docket no. 12) and withdrew her earlier opposition. The motion is now fully briefed and ready for decision. / /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.