Williams-McGloster

Williams-McGloster v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20193:18-cv-01661California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHANEENA WILLIAMS- Case No.: 18cv1661-WQH-RNB

MCGLOSTER,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 14 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 HAYES, Judge: 17 The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation issued 18 by United States Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block (ECF No. 21), recommending that 19 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) be granted, the Commissioner’s 20 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) be denied, and that Judgment be 21 entered reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding this matter for further 22 administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 23 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 24 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 25 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 26 report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.