Rademaker

Rademaker v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20193:17-cv-02406California9,427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID RADEMAKER, Case No.: 17-cv-02406-JLB-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

D. PARAMO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 43]

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David Rademaker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.) Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that various staff members at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion by failing to provide him with an adequate kosher diet. (See ECF No. 1.) Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 62.) The parties have consented to the disposition of this case by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.