Olson
Olson v. Becton, Dickinson and Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHIL OLSON, individually, and on behalf Case No.: 19cv865-MMA (BGS) of other members of the general public similarly situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
Plaintiff, [Doc. No. 8] v.
BECTON, DICKINSON AND
COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Phil Olson (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative class action against Defendant Becton, Dickinson, and Company (“Defendant”) in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. See Doc. No. 1, Ex. A (hereinafter “Compl.”). On May 8, 2019, Defendant removed the action to this Court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). See Doc. No. 1. On June 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action back to state court. See Doc. No. 8. Defendant filed an opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. See Doc. Nos. 9, 10. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral…