Haskins
Haskins v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN HASKINS, Case No. 19cv0943-JAH (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT (Doc. No. 8) WALMART INC., et al., Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Justin Haskins’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand to State Court (“Motion”). See Doc. No. 8. Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a response in opposition. See Doc. No. 10. The Motion is fully briefed. After careful review of the pleadings submitted by both parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion. BACKGROUND This case was removed to this Court on May 20, 2019. See Doc. No. 1. On June 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Motion to remand. See Doc. No. 8. Plaintiff’s class action complaint alleges (1) failure to pay vested vacation at time of…