Goodrum

Goodrum v. Hoshino

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20193:11-cv-02262California6,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Tony Goodrum, Case No.: 3:11-cv-2262-AJB-LL Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. 13 Cynthia Y. Tampkins, (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND 14 Respondent. RECOMMENDATION, (Doc. No. 91); 15 (2) DENYING THE SECOND

AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS, (Doc. No. 75);

AND

(3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

22 23 Before the Court is Petitioner Tony Goodrum’s (“Petitioner”) Second Amended 24 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). (Doc. No. 75.) On February 23, 2018, 25 Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler issued a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) 26 recommending the Petition be denied. (Doc. No. 91.) On June 18, 2018, Petitioner filed 27 objections to the R&R. (Doc. No. 96.) Respondent replied to the objections on June 28, 28 2018. (Doc. No. 97). For the reasons outlined below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R and DENIES the Petition. I. BACKGROUND The Court gives deference to state court findings of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.