Holestine

Holestine v. R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20193:18-cv-02094California3,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST KELLY HOLESTINE, Case No.: 18-cv-02094-AJB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING IN PART THE R.J. DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL

REPORT AND

FACILITY et al., RECOMMENDATION; Defendants. 16 (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS; AND

(3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT

21 Presently before the Court are: (1) Defendants Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR” collectively with the RJD, “Entity Defendants”), D. Mendez, G. Murphy, P. Khder, P. Bracamonte, J. Bonilla, M. Voong, D. Paramo, A. Mondet, J. Juarez, and P. Chapman’s (“Individual Defendants” collectively with Entity Defendants, “Defendants”) motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Doc Nos. 19-1, 25, 41); and (2) Plaintiff Ernest Kelly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.