Lotsoff
Lotsoff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELEN LOTSOFF and ASHLEIGH Case No.: 18-cv-02033-AJB-JLB HARTMAN, on behalf of other persons 12 similarly situated, ORDER: 13 Plaintiffs, (1) DENYING DEFENDANT WELLS 14 v. FARGO BANK’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., FCTI,
16 INC., and DOES 1-50, inclusive, (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN Defendants.
AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND
(3) DENYING DEFENDANT FCTI,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
21 (Doc. Nos. 3, 16, 17)
23 Presently before the Court are Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to compel individual 24 arbitration, (Doc. No. 3), Plaintiffs Helen Lotsoff and Ashleigh Hartman’s motion for leave 25 to file an amended complaint, (Doc. No. 17), and Defendant FCTI, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, 26 (Doc. No. 16). Having reviewed the parties’ arguments and controlling legal authority, and 27 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court…