Farr

Farr v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20193:16-cv-01279California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES EMMETT FARR, Case No.: 16-CV-1279 JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT AND

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al.,

RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL

Defendants. OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER

(ECF No. 82)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Emmett Farr’s “request that this Court revisit Plaintiff[’]s previous motion[] . . . for TRO in which his original motion lists this exact situational possibility where Plaintiff is removed of his legal property, papers, books, and notes, based on a fabricated rules violation.” Mot. for Reconsideration (ECF No. 82) at 4–5. In his original motion, Plaintiff requested an Order restraining Defendants from, among other things, “placing Plaintiff in Administrative Segregation and subsequently depriving him of his legal papers and books” and “falsifying Rules Violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.