Farr
Farr v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES EMMETT FARR, Case No.: 16-CV-1279 JLS (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT AND
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al.,
RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL
Defendants. OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER
(ECF No. 82)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Emmett Farr’s “request that this Court revisit Plaintiff[’]s previous motion[] . . . for TRO in which his original motion lists this exact situational possibility where Plaintiff is removed of his legal property, papers, books, and notes, based on a fabricated rules violation.” Mot. for Reconsideration (ECF No. 82) at 4–5. In his original motion, Plaintiff requested an Order restraining Defendants from, among other things, “placing Plaintiff in Administrative Segregation and subsequently depriving him of his legal papers and books” and “falsifying Rules Violation…