In Re: Easysaver Rewards Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 IN RE EASYSAVER REWARDS Case No. 09-cv-02094-BAS-WVG
LITIGATION
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
AND COSTS
17 [ECF No. 338] 18 19 After a decade and two trips to the Court of Appeals, one issue remains in this consumer class action involving coupons: the proper amount of the attorney’s fee award. The Ninth Circuit vacated the Court’s prior award because it did not comply with the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). Now, upon remand, Plaintiffs renew their request for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 338.) They ask the Court to ignore the value of the settlement’s coupon relief but still award the same amount of fees. (Id.) Defendants do not oppose, but the class member who succeeded in challenging the prior award on appeal objects to Plaintiffs’ request. (ECF Nos. 342, 343.) 28 The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R.…