Suazo

Suazo v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20193:19-cv-01882California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NISMEL M. FUNES SUAZO Case No.: 19cv1882-LAB (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting

ORDER; AND

Secretary of U.S. DHS and 15 Commissioner of U.S. DHS, et al.

ORDER REQUIRING

16 Respondents. PETITIONER TO SUPPLEMENT OR AMEND

On September 30, Petitioner Nismel Michell Funes Suazo1 (“Funes”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and along with it a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Respondents apparently have no notice of the TRO motion, and the motion does not explain why a TRO should be granted before they can respond. For this reason alone, the motion is subject to denial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). The

26 1 The Petition notes that in some Department of Homeland Security documents, Funes’ second surname is misspelled as “Sauzo.” The Petition refers to her as 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.