Suazo
Suazo v. Barr
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NISMEL M. FUNES SUAZO Case No.: 19cv1882-LAB (MSB)
Petitioner,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting
ORDER; AND
Secretary of U.S. DHS and 15 Commissioner of U.S. DHS, et al.
ORDER REQUIRING
16 Respondents. PETITIONER TO SUPPLEMENT OR AMEND
On September 30, Petitioner Nismel Michell Funes Suazo1 (“Funes”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and along with it a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Respondents apparently have no notice of the TRO motion, and the motion does not explain why a TRO should be granted before they can respond. For this reason alone, the motion is subject to denial. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). The
26 1 The Petition notes that in some Department of Homeland Security documents, Funes’ second surname is misspelled as “Sauzo.” The Petition refers to her as 28…