Conyers

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20193:19-cv-01320California1,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWAYNE RUSSELL CONYERS, Case No. 19cv1320-BAS-AHG Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The Petition is subject to dismissal without prejudice because Petitioner has failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failed to name a proper respondent, failed to allege exhaustion of state court remedies and failed to state a claim cognizable on federal habeas. FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. FAILURE TO NAME A PROPER RESPONDENT On federal habeas, a state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.