L.S.
L.S. v. Oliver
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
l 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || L.S., Case No.: 19cv746-JLS-LL Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
13 || Vv. MOTION TO COMPEL 14 |} WILLIAM ASHLEY OLIVER III, et al. [ECF No. 13] Defendants. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is Defendant William A. Oliver III’s Motion to Compel [ECF No. 13] (“Mot.”) and Plaintiff L.S.’s Opposition [ECF No. 15] (“Opp.’). For the 91 || Teasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion. RELEVANT DISCOVERY BACKGROUND The instant motion arises from Defendant’s Request for Production No. 14. RFP No. 14 requests: All documents and ESI, including text messages, emails, and social media messages (including Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram), You have sent to any person, including Oliver, Lidia Chesnokova, Brock Gorubec, Caroline Oliver and …