Rasuwl
Rasuwl v. Hays
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20193:19-cv-01832California998 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ALMALIK RASUWL, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01832-MMA-WVG
CDCR #BK-0601,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a);
MARK HAYS; FRANK CLAMSER;
[Doc. No. 2]
APRIL SIPPERLEY; JUSTIN WHITE,
Defendants. DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILING TO PREPAY FILING
FEES REQUIRED BY
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 15 Plaintiff Almalik Rasuwl, currently housed at the California Institution for Men located in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a Complaint pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time he submitted his Complaint, but instead has filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See…