Robinson

Robinson v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20193:18-cv-01918California1,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 18-cv-1918-AJB-AGS Jeffrey ROBINSON, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE

Plaintiff,

TO PROSECUTE

v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff’s counsel has failed to participate in these proceedings for many months. So this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. BACKGROUND A. Early Proceedings and First Show-Cause Hearing In February 2019, plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond to defense counsel’s emails to arrange the Rule 26(f) conference. (ECF No. 12, at 1.) Plaintiff’s counsel ultimately failed to participate in the February 27, 2019 Rule 26(f) conference and failed to contribute to the Joint Discovery Plan, which the defense filed alone on March 11, 2019. (ECF No. 11, at 3; ECF No. 12, at 1; ECF No. 17.) That same day, plaintiff’s counsel failed to submit the Court-ordered Early Neutral …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.