Robinson
Robinson v. City of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 18-cv-1918-AJB-AGS Jeffrey ROBINSON, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE
Plaintiff,
TO PROSECUTE
v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff’s counsel has failed to participate in these proceedings for many months. So this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. BACKGROUND A. Early Proceedings and First Show-Cause Hearing In February 2019, plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond to defense counsel’s emails to arrange the Rule 26(f) conference. (ECF No. 12, at 1.) Plaintiff’s counsel ultimately failed to participate in the February 27, 2019 Rule 26(f) conference and failed to contribute to the Joint Discovery Plan, which the defense filed alone on March 11, 2019. (ECF No. 11, at 3; ECF No. 12, at 1; ECF No. 17.) That same day, plaintiff’s counsel failed to submit the Court-ordered Early Neutral …