Delisle

Delisle v. Speedy Cash

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20193:18-cv-02042California3,624 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY DELISLE and ROBERT Case No.: 3:18-CV-2042-GPC-RBB DOUGHERTY, Individually and On 12 Behalf of All Others Similarly ORDER GRANTING A Situated, DISCRETIONARY STAY

FOR NINETY (90) DAYS

Plaintiffs,

v. [ECF No. 30.] SPEEDY CASH, Defendant. 18 Before the court comes Defendant-Applicant Speedy Cash (“Defendant”) seeking an order to stay proceedings in its suit against Plaintiffs Cindy Delisle, Robert Dougherty, and their putative class (“Plaintiffs”). ECF No. 30. After this Court denied Defendant’s initial motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings, ECF No. 23, Defendant filed a still-pending appeal of that decision before the Ninth Circuit. See ECF Nos. 31, 33, 34. The question before the Court now is whether, given that appeal, the Court should stay all proceedings according to the test articulated by the Supreme Court in Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.