Wilson

Wilson v. Cuevas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20193:16-cv-02100California8,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD WILSON, Case No.: 3:16-cv-2100-BTM-MSB

CDCR #B-93800,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

A. CUEVAS; M. MOYA;

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

J. OLIVO; M.A. MENDOZA,

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

16 Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; AND 17 (2) ISSUING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST

MOYA SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FRCP

20 4(m) 21 [ECF No. 62] 22 23 Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 by Defendants Cuevas, Olivo, and Mendoza (ECF No. 62). After he was notified of the requirements for opposing summary pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 64), and granted extensions of time (ECF Nos. 79, 92), Plaintiff filed his Opposition (“Opp’n”) (ECF No. 95). For the reasons explained, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.