Wilson
Wilson v. Cuevas
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20193:16-cv-02100California8,213 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD WILSON, Case No.: 3:16-cv-2100-BTM-MSB
CDCR #B-93800,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
A. CUEVAS; M. MOYA;
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
J. OLIVO; M.A. MENDOZA,
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
16 Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; AND 17 (2) ISSUING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST
MOYA SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FRCP
20 4(m) 21 [ECF No. 62] 22 23 Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 by Defendants Cuevas, Olivo, and Mendoza (ECF No. 62). After he was notified of the requirements for opposing summary pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 64), and granted extensions of time (ECF Nos. 79, 92), Plaintiff filed his Opposition (“Opp’n”) (ECF No. 95). For the reasons explained, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’…