Harari

Harari v. PriceSmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20193:19-cv-00958California1,955 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAX MORRIS HARARI, individually Case No.: 19-CV-958 JLS (LL) and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD Plaintiff,

PLAINTIFF, AND (2) APPROVING

14 v. CHOICE OF COUNSEL

PRICESMART, INC., JOSE LUIS

(ECF No. 4) LAPARTE, JOHN M. HEFFNER, and

MAARTEN O. JAGER,

17 Defendants. 18 Presently before the Court is Movant Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico’s (“PERA”) Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Choice of Counsel (“Mot.,” ECF No. 4). Also before the Court is PERA’s Response in Support of the Motion (“Resp.,” ECF No. 21). Having considered PERA’s arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS the Motion. BACKGROUND The present case is a putative securities class action that arises from allegations of false and misleading statements in violation of federal securities laws. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.