Sandoval

Sandoval v. Guldseth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20193:19-cv-01584California3,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERTO SANDOVAL, Case No.: 19-cv-01584-BAS-RBB

CDCR #AM-0186,

ORDER: Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING MOTION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA 14 PAUPERIS [ECF No. 3]; DAVID GULDSETH, M.D.; ROMAN B.

CHAM, M.D., AND

16 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b) 19 On August 23, 2019, Alberto Sandoval (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”.) Plaintiff has not paid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2 (“IFP Motion”).) I. Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.