Rossmann

Rossmann v. Wojcicki

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20193:19-cv-00014California285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRUD ROSSMANN, Case No.: 3:19-CV-00014 JAH (NLS)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. SUSAN WOJCICKI, ET AL., Defendants.

17 On June 10, 2019, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and ordered Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a renewed motion to proceed IFP no later than June 21, 2019. See ECF No. 10. The Court explicitly stated that “[s]hould Plaintiff fail to file a renewed motion to proceed IFP and correct the deficiencies in his Complaint identified by the Court within the time provided, the Court may dismiss this civil action without leave to amend.” Id. (emphasis in the original). Following the Court’s Order, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, ECF No. 12, and shortly after voluntarily dismissed the appeal. See ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has not filed a renewed motion to proceed IFP or payed the filing fee. See generally Docket. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.