Dawes

Dawes v. The People

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20193:19-cv-01921California661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ORREN DAWES, Case No.: 19cv1921-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE, Defendant. 16 On October 2, 2019, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2241. [Doc. No. 1.] Petitioner did not pay the filing fee and did not file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis. This Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM ON HABEAS CORPUS Upon review of the Petition, it appears to the Court that a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus brought pursuant to § 2241 is not the proper vehicle for the claims Petitioner presents. Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.