McCullock

McCullock v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20193:18-cv-00548California2,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT MCCULLOCK, Case No.: 18-cv-00548-WQH-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING:

v. (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ROBERT BROWN, et al.,

COMPEL; AND

Defendants. (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS

17 [ECF Nos. 67, 77] 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert McCullock’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 67.) Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 73.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions. (ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motions are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a pro se litigant currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility. On March 1, 2019, Plaintiff constructively filed a Motion to Compel, requesting that the Court compel Defendants to respond to his Second Set of Interrogatories. (ECF No. 38.) Defendants opposed Plaintiff’s motion on the bases that it was premature, as their responses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.