Raya
Raya v. Calbiotech
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT RAYA, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2643-WQH-AHG
Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES
CALBIOTECH,
TO DISCOVERY AND FOR
Defendant / Counter-Claimant. SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
16 [ECF No. 20] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is Defendant Calbiotech’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery and for Sanctions against Plaintiff. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff Robert Raya (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, opposes the motion. ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Defendant served Plaintiff with Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production of Documents3 (collectively, “Discovery Requests”). ECF No. 20-1 at 2. To date, Defendant has not received responses to any of the Discovery Requests. Id. Thus, Defendant…