Raya

Raya v. Calbiotech

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20193:18-cv-02643California3,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT RAYA, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2643-WQH-AHG

Plaintiff / Counter-Defendant,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES

CALBIOTECH,

TO DISCOVERY AND FOR

Defendant / Counter-Claimant. SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF

16 [ECF No. 20] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is Defendant Calbiotech’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery and for Sanctions against Plaintiff. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff Robert Raya (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, opposes the motion. ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Defendant served Plaintiff with Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production of Documents3 (collectively, “Discovery Requests”). ECF No. 20-1 at 2. To date, Defendant has not received responses to any of the Discovery Requests. Id. Thus, Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.