Grey

Grey v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20193:16-cv-02764California9,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTUON EUGENE GREY, Case No.: 16-cv-2764-GPC-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING THE

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

WARREN L. MONTGOMERY

DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

Warden, OF HABEAS CORPUS Defendant.

17 Presently before this Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254, filed by Petitioner Antuon Eugene Grey (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner 19 proceeding with counsel. Pet., Dkt. No. 1. In his petition, Grey seeks to challenge his 20 convictions in San Diego Superior Court for murder, attempted murder, and assault with 21 firearm. Pet., Dkt. No. 1. On March 15, 2017, Respondent Warren L. Montgomery, 22 Warden, filed an Answer and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the 23 Answer (“Answer”) and Lodgments. Dkt. Nos. 14–15. Petitioner filed a Traverse on 24 June 19, 2017. Dkt. No. 20. On September 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge John L. 25 Weinberg issued a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.