Jones

Jones v. Nisleit

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20193:19-cv-01800California2,908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARLO Q. JONES, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01800-MMA-WVG Booking #19750426,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; vs. 13 [Doc. No. 2]

CHIEF DAVID LISLEIT; OFFICER

CAIRESDON; OFFICER DUDLEY,

DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 17 1915A(b) 18 Plaintiff Marlo Jones, while detained at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not pay the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. II. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.