Reed
Reed v. Paramo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20193:18-cv-00361California7,418 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL)
CDCR #AE-9821,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
D. PARAMO; J. LUNA; E. ZENDEJAS;
C. CRESPO; N. SCHARR; P. COVELLO; (ECF Nos. 65, 78)
A. GARCIA; and N. MARIENTES, Defendants.
Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants C. Crespo, J. Luna, D. Paramo, and E. Zendejas (ECF No. 65) and Defendants N. Marientes, N. Scharr, P. Covello, and A. Garcia (ECF No. 78). …