Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20193:18-cv-00361California7,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL)

CDCR #AE-9821,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

D. PARAMO; J. LUNA; E. ZENDEJAS;

C. CRESPO; N. SCHARR; P. COVELLO; (ECF Nos. 65, 78)

A. GARCIA; and N. MARIENTES, Defendants.

Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants C. Crespo, J. Luna, D. Paramo, and E. Zendejas (ECF No. 65) and Defendants N. Marientes, N. Scharr, P. Covello, and A. Garcia (ECF No. 78). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.