Schutza

Schutza v. Walter E. Fiedler Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20193:18-cv-00257California1,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 Case No. 18-cv-0257-BAS-LL

SCOTT SCHUTZA,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS,

AND POST-JUDGMENT

INTEREST v.

WALTER E. FIELDER, INC.;

AVIAN AND EXOTIC ANIMAL

HOSPITAL, Inc., et al., Defendants. 20 On August 20, 2019, Plaintiff Scott Schutza requested the Court enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68(a). (ECF No. 32.) Defendants had provided Plaintiff with an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, and Plaintiff accepted the offer. (ECF Nos. 32-1 and 32-2.) The Court entered judgment per the terms of Defendants’ offer, (ECF No. 32-1). (ECF No. 33.) On October 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed an application for writ of execution, requesting an additional $721.00 in fees and costs. (ECF No. 35.) Defendants accepted) provides that Plaintiff is not entitled to recover costs or attorney fees. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants asked the Court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.