Cejas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANDREW CEJAS, Case No.: 14-cv-1923-WQH-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo (ECF No. 111), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike or Set Aside Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses (ECF No. 97) be denied. The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The district court need not review de novo those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which neither party…