Davis

Davis v. Booth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20193:19-cv-01538California1,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DAVIS, Case No.: 19-cv-01538-AJB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S MONIQUE BOOTH ET AL.

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 1);

16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT (Doc. No. 2);

AND

19 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

AS MOOT (Doc. No. 3.) 22

24 25

27 28 Presently before the Court is John Davis’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and motion to appoint counsel. (Doc. Nos. 2–3.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint WITH PREJUDICE, DENIES Plaintiff’s IFP motion AS MOOT, and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel AS MOOT. I. SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), when reviewing an IFP motion, the Court must rule on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.