Varol

Varol v. Radel

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20193:19-cv-00524California4,749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUGCE VAROL, Case No.: 19cv0524 GPC JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

DAVID M. RADEL, Los Angeles Asylum [Dkt. No. 4] Office, Director, U.S. Citizenship and 15 Immigration Services, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 On July 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a form I-589 with the United States Citizenship 19 and Immigration Services (USCIS) to apply for asylum and withholding of removal. 20 (Dkt. No. 1 at 3.) More than three years later, Plaintiff is still waiting to schedule an 21 asylum interview with USCIS and for ultimate adjudication of her asylum application. 22 (Id.) She reports that the delays have produced great stress and anxiety and has prompted 23 the filing of this action which requires the Court to determine whether it has the 24 jurisdiction to entertain the case and, if so, whether the law provides Plaintiff a 25 cognizable cause of action. While the Court appreciates the difficulties that Plaintiff has 26 experienced in the course of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.