Kurin, Inc. v. Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20193:18-cv-01060California3,194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KURIN, INC., Case No.: 3:18-cv-1060-L-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S MAGNOLIA MEDICAL

OBJECTION TO ORDER DENYING

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Defendant. COMPEL [ECF No. 38]; AND

(2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR PARTIAL

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF No. 28]

20 Pending before the Court is Defendant Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc.’s 21 (“Magnolia”) motion for partial judgment on the pleadings [ ECF No. 28] and Plaintiff 22 Kurin Inc.’s (“Kurin”) objection to an order denying Kurin’s motion to compel responses 23 to Kurin’s first set of requests for production of documents (“RFP”) [ECF No. 38]. The 24 Court shall determine these motions upon the moving papers without oral argument 25 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. For the following reasons, Kurin’s objection is 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.