Quidel Corporation v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20193:16-cv-03059California1,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 QUIDEL CORPORATION, Case No. 16-cv-3059-BAS-AGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES AND

v. SANCTIONS

SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS [ECF No. 132] USA, INC., et al.,

16 Defendants.

17 Defendants Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. move for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1117(a) and for sanctions against Plaintiff Quidel Corporation and its counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 132.) I. BACKGROUND An extensive background of this case can be found in the Court’s order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (See ECF No. 254.) II. LEGAL STANDARD A. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) The Lanham Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees in ‘exceptional’ [was] not defined in the statute, generally a trademark case [was] exceptional for purposes of an award of attorneys’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.