Doe
Doe v. Lloyd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, Case No. 18cv2021-MMA (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
vs. MOTION TO STAY
D. LLOYD, [Doc. No. 42] Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant Dustin Lloyd. Plaintiff moves for a temporary stay of the action pending the outcome of criminal proceedings against her. See Doc. No. 42. Defendant has not filed a response in opposition to the motion. The Court took the motion under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b). See Doc. No. 43. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND This action arises primarily out of Plaintiff’s alleged altercation with Defendant Dustin Lloyd, a Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputy. The relevant factual…