Warshaw

Warshaw v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20193:19-cv-01578California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER D. WARSAW, Case No.: 19cv1578 CAB (MDD)

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) DENYING REQUEST

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AS MOOT AND (2)

MARCUS POLLARD, Warden,

DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

Respondent. PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 On August 7, 2019, Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) On September 4, 2019, Petitioner paid the requisite filing fee. (See ECF No. 3.) In its September 6, 2019 Order, the Court denied Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis as moot and dismissed the case without prejudice because Petitioner failed to state a cognizable claim. Petitioner was instructed that to have this case reopened he had to file a First Amended Petition no later than November 12, 2019. On October 28, 2019, Petitioner filed a First Amended Petition 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.