Burnett
Lynch v. Burnett
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ANTHONY LYNCH , Case No.: 18-cv-01677-DMS-JLB
REPORT AND Plaintiff,
RECOMMENDATION RE:
13 v. DEFENDANT JAMES BURNETT’S MOTION TO DISMISS KEVIN BURNETT, et al.,
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants. [ECF No. 28] 17 18 On July 23, 2018, Plaintiff Paul Anthony Lynch (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) On November 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Matthew Botkin (“Botkin”), Zachary Pfannestiel (“Pfannestiel”), Christian Sharp (“Sharp”), and James Burnett (“Burnett” or “Defendant”). (ECF No. 5.) All defendants moved to dismiss the FAC. (ECF No. 12.) The undersigned issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court (1) deny the motion as to 27 …