Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUWAYNE JACKSON, Case No.: 17cv882-CAB-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REOPEN DISCOVERY [Doc. No. 141] DANIEL PARAMO, et al., Defendant. 16 On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff Duwayne Jackson, now represented by counsel, filed a motion to reopen discovery. [Doc. No. 141.] On October 16, 2019, Defendants Romero and Valdovinos filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 149.] On October 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed a reply. [Doc. No. 150.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Rule 16(b), a scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b)(4). The “good cause” standard “primarily considers the diligence of the party seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir.1992). The court may modify the 27 …