Spatcher
Spatcher v. Baird
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20193:19-cv-01936California2,902 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 19cv1936 CDCR #BJ-9222, Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2];
AND
NORI BAIRD; TRI CITY MEDICAL 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
CENTER; OCEANSIDE POLICE
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
DEP’T,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Defendants. 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) [ECF No. 1] 19 Gregory Leon Spatcher (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP …