Spatcher

Spatcher v. Baird

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20193:19-cv-01936California2,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 19cv1936 CDCR #BJ-9222, Plaintiff, 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2];

AND

NORI BAIRD; TRI CITY MEDICAL 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

CENTER; OCEANSIDE POLICE

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

DEP’T,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Defendants. 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) [ECF No. 1] 19 Gregory Leon Spatcher (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.