Gilbert v. San Bernardino
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHAKA D. GILBERT, Case No.: 19cv2052-GPC (AHG)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAN BERNARDINO and COALINGA, Respondents. 15 Petitioner, a person detained at the California Department of State Hospitals, Coalinga, is proceeding pro se with a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The Petition is subject to dismissal without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failure to name a respondent, failure to sign the Petition, and failure to state a cognizable habeas claim. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice. …