Goolsby

Goolsby v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20193:17-cv-00564California1,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS GOOLSBY, Case No.: 3:17-cv-564-WQH-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION

Defendants. ON DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO

VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER;

18 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO

FILE MSJ OPPOSITION,

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, OR

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, ORDER

DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH HIS

LEGAL PROPERTY

[ECF Nos. 139, 140]

27 28 Before the Court are two related motions: (1) Defendants’ ex parte motion to extend their time to file a reply to their pending motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”) and to vacate the mandatory settlement conference date and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.